![]() ![]() “In a function language…” should probably read “In a functional language”.Įnd of section 3.4, second to last paragraph. “However, there are some functionals…” -> “some functions” …pretty much follows the form of your spec …pretty must follows the form of your spec The module Debug, functionally is practically the same that Guard in page 46. The next beta will show this.\n\n\nModule names are a syntactic sugar: Fred is converted to :Elixir.Fred Io cannot be an atom since it’s not preceded You say it’sĪn atom - page 22 says atoms must be preceded by a colon I’m confused as to exactly what the a module name is. It's a function call, so the parentheses are optional. If it’s deliberate it double be noce to know Which is inconsistent, it should be or the parameters should be (3,4) (BadArityError) bad arity error: #Function “The types are the same, or are compatible (for example 3 > 2or 3.0 func.(9, 4) > are evaluated and the result is substituted back in > are evaluated as the result is substituted back in “chaacter codes” should be “character codes” The first paragraph in the “Regular expressions” section defines the syntax as %r ) #=> Ģ103 should be 2013 in elixir version of exampleĪ=b # strict equality (so 1 1.0 is false)Ī=b # strict equality (so 1 = 1.0 is false) Maybe add a note about the delimiters of the regular expression being (semi-)freely selectable. In description of the “r” option for regular expressions, the words “matching as must as possible” should read “matching as much as possible”. Which is a success, and the text “But here the 1 (the second term in the list) cannot be…” The first paragraph on page #14 refers to the second to last example on page #13, causing a mismatch between the last example read: The book is tracking the latest versions, and the next beta will say R16B (although it makes no appreciable difference to the content) ![]() ![]() The last version in the installation guide installs the last erlang version (R16B) but the book is still referring to version R15B03. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |